Innuendo in Music as an Active Perception Factor

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31318/2522-4190.2022.134.269580

Keywords:

innuendo, interactivity in music, listener's activity, useful cliché

Abstract

Relevance of the study. A problem, discussed in the article is listener's co-activity in the process of perception music. Communicative aspects of art were deeply and variously studied in many musicologists' works. But item of listener's co-participation in phenomena of tension between potential, most probable way of composer's thought (from one side) and the real sounding of musical composition (from another side) is not completely explored. Phenomena of music is considered as a dialogue among composition and listener's consciousness, in spite of traditional view to music as a composer's monologue only.

Main objective is to reveal the communicative and aesthetic potential of innuendo in music. One of the most significant expedients in this sphere of thinking is innuendo. In the context of recent paper this notion is treated as absence of the most waited music material as a specific mean, which causes more sharp and strong perception of tide of sounds.

Methodology. Methods of this study are: conditional comparative analysis of a music compositions' set; modeling of listener's expectations from music; reconstruction of composers' design, using the author’s experience of composing. These methods were explored in the modeling of listener’s perception of the several music compositions of different styles.

The results and conclusions. Contemporary academic concert music, as a rule, means a division to active music makers (e.g. composer, improviser, performer) and passive listener. However, even in art styles the vivid link between piece of music and public contains hidden interactivity of listener. It may be a relict of co-participation in music performance in the folk and church traditions. There is no real interactivity in art genres because of listener's impossibility to intervene into real sounding structures. But in the context of certain style advanced listener has an opportunity to feel the difference between most probable and real composer's variants of continuation. Listener is presented as a reconstructor of composer's ideas, of course, in cause of his knowledge of present style.

Such expectations of listener belong to functionality in music. Innuendo is effect of pseudodeconstruction, based on the functional expectations system. There are such types of music innuendo as: 1) vertical (absence of expected texture component); 2) horizontal (absence of expected continuation); 3) active (by disruption of expected continuation); 4) passive (absence without disruption); 5) provocative (incompleteness as an occasion to maintain more complete version of present theme).

Absence as a kind of Presence (Heidegger) is an ontological basis of innuendo effect, because it is replaced full Presence as real in the place of expected. Thereby reality of this fragment isn't absolute but one from set of possibilities. Dialogue between "Listener's Variant" and "Composers variant" is a realization of ontological time's potential, which contains more than one option in future.

References

Gnesin, M. F. (2018). Nachalnyi kurs prakticheskoi kompozitcii [Practical composition for beginners]. Moscow: Planeta muzyki. 224 p. [in Russian].

Denisov, E. V. (1986). Sovremennaja muzyka i problemy evoljucii kompozitorskoj tehniki [Modern music and problems of composers’ technique evolution]. Moscow: Sovetskij kompozitor. 207 p. [in Russian].

Zhitomirskij, D. V., Leont'eva, O.T., Mjalo, K. G. (1989). Zapadnyi muzykal'nyi avangard posle vtoroi mirovoj vojny [Western music avant-garde after WWII]. Moscow: Muzyka. 303 p. [in Russian].

Kovalinas, M. A. (2020). Lekcija 1. «Pershyj» Bethoven. [Lecture 1. “The First” Beethoven. Available at: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlDVZIVmgZc&t=1799s> (Accessed: 12.11.2021) [in Russian].

Nikolaievska, Yu. V. (2020). Homo interpretatus v muzychnomu mystetstvi ХХ – pochatku ХХІ stolit: monohrafiya. [Homo interpretatus in the musical art of the 20th and early 21st centuries: a monograph]. Kharkiv: Fact. 576 p. [in Ukrainian]

Milka, A. P. (1982). Teoreticheskie osnovy funkcional'nosti v muzyke. [Theoretical fundamentals of functionality in music]. Lenengrad: Muzyka. 150 p. [in Russian].

Moskalenko, V.G. (2013). Lekcii' z muzychnoi' interpretacii': Navchal'nyj posibnyk [Lectures on music interpretation. Tutorial]. Kyiv: Nacіonal'na muzichna akademіja Ukrainy. 134 p. [in Ukrainian]

Podvala, V. D. (1988). Davaite sochiniat muzyku! 1–2 classy. [Let’s make music! To the 1st – 2nd classes]. Kyiv: Muzychna Ukraina. 65 p. [in Russian].

Sokolov, A. V. (1992). Muzykal'naja kompozicija XX veka: dialektika tvorchestva [Music composition of XX century: dialectic of creativity]. Moscow: Muzyka. 230 p. [in Russian].

Stron'ko, B. Yu. Status bytijnogo vremeni v muzyke [The status of existential time in music. Art criticism thesis]. Manuscript of Dissertation work for gaining the degree of the Candidate of Art Criticism by specialty 17.00.03 Music Art. Tchaikovsky National Music Academy of Ukraine. Kyiv, 266 p. [in Russian].

Heidegger, M. (1993). Vremja i Bytie [Time and Being]. Moscow: Respublika. 447 p. [in Russian].

Shevchuk, K. (2011). Do analizu osnovnyh idej estetyky Romana Ingardena [To analysis of main aesthetic ideas by Roman Ingarden] In: Naukovi zapysky Nacional'nogo universytetu "Ostroz'ka akademiya". Seria: Filosofija. – Vyp. 8.[Scientific notes of the National University ‘Academy of Ostrog’. Series: Philosophy. – Issue 8] – pp. 166-174. [in Ukrainian]

Kratus, J. (2017). Music listening is creative. In: Music Educators Journal. March. pp. 46–51. DOI:10.1177/0027432116686843. [in English].

Reitan, I. E. (2013). Listening to music – with professional ears. In: Aural perspectives. On musical learning and practice in higher music education, pp 53–73. [in English].

Published

2022-11-17

Issue

Section

THEORETICAL MUSICOLOGY: PROBLEM AREAS AND NEW PROPOSALS