Compositional Technique as a Tool of Political Statement in the Works of Louis Andriessen

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31318/2522-4190.2021.132.249987

Keywords:

music and politics, minimalism, Dutch music of the second half of the 20th century, the works of L. Andriessen

Abstract

Relevance of the study. The work of Louis Andriessen, a Dutch composer, is regarded as a significant contribution to the formation of music culture of the second half of the 20th century. Despite his influence, however, there are practically no research papers in domestic musicology that would analyze Andriessen’s work and personality or his professional musical and political activities. One of the main research topics related to Andriessen’s work is the influence of politics on music. The topic itself is quite particular and somewhat controversial because it always leaves a lot of questions that need further clarification, may require a different perspective and a new approach. One of such questions with a controversial view is a discussion of how compositional techniques can be influenced by and formed based upon the composer’s political views.

Main objective of the study. Taking into consideration Louis Andriessen’s own experiences, analyze how his compositional techniques created political content of his works, and particularly the writing of the cantata “De Staat” (“The Republic”) by Plato.

Methods. The following were used in the research analysis: biographical (in the analyses of the style and work of the composer); historical (in the analyses of the cultural and socio-political context); comparative (in the analyses of the political and aesthetic views and standpoints of artists); analytical (in the analyses of the musical works).

Results/findings and conclusions. There were several reasons that led Louis Andriessen to appeal to minimalism. The main reason was the composer’s desire to respond to his fellow composers that themselves were searching for their own applicable techniques and style to disseminate political ideas. Minimalism was particularly attractive to the composer because it was relevant, easily accessible to the general public, and reflective. At the same time, it was politically appropriate and democratic. The musical and political activism of Andriessen was aimed at creating a new type of communication and relationships between a composer and a performer, a performer and audience, and ultimately at creating a new musical community. This new type of communication and community is reflected in the composer’s work “The Republic”. For performers in particular, “The Republic” became a practical exercise similar to the style of Lehrstück B. Brecht, which allowed performers to adapt to new musical interactions proposed by the composer. Andriessen was able to achieve this goal by using hocket techniques — i. e., by removing the role inequality among performers and emphasizing the expressive importance of each performer in a musical composition. However, Andriessen’s compositional techniques used in “The Republic” to reflect his political views did not support, but rather emphasized the composer’s contradictory political position and in particular his binary position to Plato’s views on the place of music in politics. Nevertheless, it was “The Republic” that started the creation of a unique performance and approach in musical composition called “Andriessen’s approach”, which would successfully combine minimalism with traditional European compositional techniques, modern and experimental techniques, and components of music at large. At the very end, the unique combination of the aforementioned compositional techniques is what identifies the specificity of the content of Andriessen’s music. Significance of these results consists in the point of view on the question of how a compositional technique forms political content in the music written by Louis Andriessen

Author Biography

Vitalii Vyshynskyi, Tchaikovsky National Music Academy of Ukraine

Candidate of Art Criticism (Doctor of Philosophy /Arts/), Associate Professor of the Department of Theory and History of Culture

References

Andriessen, L. (2005). A brief history of De Volharding [Kratkaya istoriya De Volharding]. In: Andriessen, L. The Art of Stealing Time [Ukradennoe vremja]. Saint Petersburg: Kul’tInformPress, pp. 121–129 [in Russian].

Andriessen, L. (2005). Conversation about the State [Razgovor o Gosudarstve]. In: Andriessen, L. The Art of Stealing Time [Ukradennoe vremja]. Saint Petersburg: Kul’tInformPress, pp. 139–146 [in Russian].

Andriessen, L. (2005). Where did Time come from? [Otkuda est' poshlo Vremya]. In: Andriessen, L. The Art of Stealing Time [Ukradennoe vremja]. Saint Petersburg: Kul’tInformPress, pp. 147–161 [in Russian].

Aristotle. (1983) Politics [Politika]. In: Aristotle. Works [Sochinenija], in 4 vols. Vol. 4. Moscow: Mysl’, pp. 375–644 [in Russian].

Aristotle. (2000). Aristotle. Politics [Polityka]. Kyiv: Osnovy, 239 p. [in Ukrainian].

Vyshynskyi, V. Andriessen, Louis [Lui Andrissen]. In: Great Ukrainian Encyclopedia [Velyka ukrainska entsyklopediia]. Available at: https://vue.gov.ua/Андріссен,_Луї (accessed: 29.06.2021) [in Ukrainian].

Vyshynskyi, V. (2013). Tempo Progression in the Music of the 20 Century [Tempovaja progressija v muzyke ХХ veka]. In: Scientific herald of Tchaikovsky National Music Academy of Ukraine [Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoi muzychnoi akademii Ukrainy imeni P. I. Chaikovskoho], Issue 108: Mechanisms of innovations in musical creativity [Mekhanizmy novatsii u muzychnii tvorchosti]. Kyiv, pp. 11–21 [in Russian].

Kirillina, l. (1995). Luigi Nono [Luidzhi Nono]. In: 20th century. The Foreign Music: Essays and Documents [XX vek. Zarubezhnaja muzyka: ocherki i dokumenty]. The State Institute for Art Studies. Issue 2. Moscow: Muzyka, pp. 11–57 [in Russian].

Коmenda, O. (2020). Universal Creative Personality in Ukrainian Musical Culture [Universalna tvorcha osobystist v ukrainskii muzychnii kulturi]. Manuscript of Dissertation work for gaining the degree of the Doctor of Art Criticism by specialty 17.00.03 Music Art. Tchaikovsky National Music Academy of Ukraine. Kyiv. 519 p. [in Ukrainian].

Kopytsia, М. (2018). Selected [Vybrane]. Kyiv; Nizhyn: Lysenko M. M. 374 p. [in Ukrainian].

Korchova, О. (2020). Music modernism as terra cognita [Muzychnyi modernizm jak terra cognita]. Kyiv: Muzychna Ukraine. 490 p. [in Ukrainian].

Manulkina, O. (2010). From Ives to Adams: American Music of 20th Century [Ot Ajvza do Adamsa: amerikanskaja muzyka XX veka]. Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Ivana Limbaha. 784 p. [in Russian].

Plato. (2000). The Republic [Derzhava]. Kyiv: Osnovy. 355 p. [in Ukrainian].

Ryzhinskij, A. (2016). L. Nono, B. Maderna, L. Berio: The Development of Italian Choral Music in the Second Half of the 20th century [L. Nono, B. Maderna, L. Berio: puti razvitija ital’janskoj horovoj muzyki vo vtoroj polovine XX veka]. Manuscript of Dissertation work for gaining the degree of the Doctor of Art Criticism by specialty 17.00.02 Music Art. Tchaikovsky National Music Academy of Ukraine. Moscow, 387 p. [in Russian].

Fedorenko, L. (2009). Breht’s Lehrstücke: formation and specific [Brekhtivski «Lehrstücke»: stanovlennia i osoblyvosti]. In: Breht B. Lehrstücke (learning plays) [Lehrstücke («navchalni» piesy)]. Zhytomyr: Ruta. 223 p. [in Ukrainian].

Shmurak, A. (2020). Music by Lous Andriessen: iron’s joy [Muzyka Lui Andrissena: zheleznoe vesel’e]. In: Kyiv Daily. Read. Look. Listen. Available at: https://kyivdaily.com.ua/luiandrissen/ (accessed: 29.06.2021) [in Russian].

Eisler, H. (1973). Several notes about the situation of contemporary composers [Neskol’ko zametok o polozhenii sovremennyh kompozitorov]. In: Eisler H. Selected articles. Conversations about music [Izbrannye stat’i. Besedy o muzyke]. Moscow: Musyka, pp. 66–70 [in Russian].

Adlington, R. (2005). Louis Andriessen, Hanns Eisler, and the Lehrstück. In: The Journal of Musicology. Vol. 21, No. 3. University of California Press, pp. 381–417.

Adlington, R. Louis Andriessen: De Staat. London and New York: Routledge, 2016. 179 p.

Everett, Y. (2007). The Music of Louis Andriessen (Music in the Twentieth Century). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 284 р.

Hepworth, D. (2016). Never a Dull Moment: Rock’s Golden Year. London: Bantam, Transworld Publishers Ltd. 384 p.

Kempton, R. (2007). Provo: Amsterdam’s Anarchist Revolt. Brooklyn: Autonomedia. 160 р.

Ross, A. (2020). Wagnerism: Art and Politics in the Shadow of Music. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 784 p.

Ross, A. (2008). The Rest Is Noise: Listening to the Twentieth Century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 720 p.

Taruskin, R. (1998). Bartok and Stravinsky: Odd Couple Reunited? In: The New York Times. October 25. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/1998/10/25/arts/bartok-and-stravinskyodd-couple-reunited.html (accessed: 30.06.2021).

Taruskin, R. (2010). The Oxford History of Western Music: in 5 vol. Vol. 5: Music in the Late Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://www.oxfordwesternmusic.com/view/Volume5/actrade-9780195384857-chapter-008.xml (accessed: 30.06.2021).

Trochimczyk, M. (2016). The Music of Louis Andriessen. New York: Routledge. 344 p.

Published

2021-11-29

Issue

Section

COMPOSITION TECHNIQUE IN INDIVIDUAL READINGS