Semiological Interpretation of the Electroacoustic Music Phenomenon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31318/2522-4190.2021.132.249964Keywords:
electroacoustic, perception, poietic process, esthetic process, semioticAbstract
As evolving technologies become more massive and more easily accessible to virtually every user, as the speed of the global Internet grows faster and more, the composer’s relationship with these capabilities takes on new meanings. It was not so much the issues of accessibility and quantity that became relevant, but rather the issues of quality, artistic value, and the uniqueness of creation. This article attempts to review the principles of composing electroacoustic music based on semiological theory. Music, as a message, passes through the various stages of creation, transforming the consciousness of both its sender and receiver. It is important to capture, highlight and define these processes. The identification of oneself as a creator and a clear, unambiguous perception of one’s work provides a clear ideological and esthetic basis for new means of composition. Electroacoustic music opens the way to hear any possible sounds, infinity of sounds — from realistic to surreal. The listener’s traditional connection to physical sound is often severed: electroacoustic sound forms and qualities usually do not reveal the original sound source and cause. Composers face the dilemma of how to ground a new esthetic field in the wide-open world of sounds, how to develop more clearly defined methods of sound creation, how to understand and explain electroacoustic music.
References
Barcellos, L. (2012). Music, Meaning, and Music Therapy under the Light of the Molino/Nattiez Tripartite Model. In: Voices, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 3–15. DOI: 10.15845/VOICES.V12I3.677 [Last checked: 2021.05.10].
Borges Neto, J. (2005). Is Music a Language? In: Electronic Musicological Review, Vol. 9, http://www.rem.ufpr.br/_REM/REMv9-1/borges-engl.html [Last checked: 2021.05.02].
Cox, Cr., Werner, D., eds. (2004). Audio Culture. Readings in Modern Music. Mew York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 454 p.
Delalande, F. (2001). Le Son des musiques. Entre technologie et esthétique. Paris: INA Buchet/Castel, 272 p.
Delalande, F. (1998). Music Analysis and Reception Behaviours: Sommeil by Pierre Henry. In: Journal of New Music Research, Vol. 27, pp. 13–66.
Dunsby, J. M. (1977). Fondements d’une Sémiologie de la Musique. In: Perspectives of the New Music. Vol. 15. No. 2, pp. 226–233.
Emmerson, S., Landy, L., eds. (2016). Expanding the Horizon of Electroacoustic Music Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 329 p.
Gonzalez, A. M., Bovone, L., eds. (2012). Identities through Fashion: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Oxford; New York: Berg Publishers, 240 p.
Koelsch, S. (2011). Towards a Neural Basis of Music Perception. In: Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 2. Jun 9. 2011. Article 110. 20 p. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00110 [Last checked: 2021.05.15].
Landy, L (2008). On the paradigmatic behaviour of sound-based music. In: Electroacoustic Music Studies Network International Conference, 3-7 juin 2008 (Paris). URL: http://www.ems-network.org/ems08/papers/landy.pdf [Last checked: 2021.05.20].
Landy, L. (2007). Understanding the Art of Sound Organization. London: MIT Press, 320 p.
Misak, C. J. (2004). Truth and the End of Inquiry: A Peircean Account of Truth (Oxford Philosophical Monographs). Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press, 232 p.
Molino, J. (1990). Musical Fact and the Semiology of Music. In: Music Analysis. Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 105–156.
Nattiez, J. J. (1990). Music and Discourse — Toward a Semiology of Music. Princeton, New Jercey: Princeton University Press. 288 p.
Wishart, T. (1996). On Sonic Art. New York: Routledge, 372 p.
