Interpretation Strategies of Contemporary Musical and Theatrical Art: Trends, Factors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31318/2522-4190.2021.131.243224Keywords:
interpretive strategies, modern musical theater, trends and factors of interpretationAbstract
Relevance of the study. The modern interpretive content main tendencies of the European and Ukrainian musical and theatrical art were analyzed. Forms of interpretation being were considered in the coordinates of the “composer-listener-performer” triad in the aspect of its correspondence to its time artistic intentions.
The scientific novelty of the study is in the analysis of innovative projects most of which are not adapted to musicology and in the formulation of trends and factors of modern musical art’s interpretive policy.
Main objective of the study is to determine the specifics and factors of the modern interpretations of a musical and theatrical art.
Methodology. The following methods have been adapted: the interpretive — in relation to the analyzed opera projects; the hermeneutic-semantic — for the purpose of identify the interpreted works’ intonation-image specificity; the comparative — to juxtaposition the “interpretive behavior” of one work in different performance versions; the intonation-dramaturgical analysis — to study the specifics and factors of works’ interpretive versions.
Results and conclusions. The modern interpretive reality initiates the emergence of radically new and the consolidation of existing non-standard trends in the work’s representation. These are: the instrumental performing theatricalization, significant expansion of the improvisation’s zone, abandonment of the opera genre canons with an emphasis on synthetic genres of performative nature and the use of bold audio, scenographic, color and light effects. The modern interpretative main trends are the actualization, the alienation and the emergence of working remote versions, the encroachment on the textual and intonational essence of a known work by adding the new material (the integral opus or the fragmentary inlay), the emergence of modern composer’s alternative role which is a co-author of a new hybrid product thanks to the connection to the work of the past.
Findings of the research. The specifics and factors of work’s variant-interpretive realization are analytically argued. The main factors are the genre-intonation specificity, the synthetic and intertextual nature, the complexity and synergy of text semantic intentions, the recipient’s culturalhistorical awareness, the socio-cultural intentions’ balance of the author and his artistic will performers, the degree of text openness, the context.
Prospects for further exploration in this direction. The following research areas are needed: 1) the development of new methods and terminological apparatus suitable for the modern artifacts’ analysis; 2) the analytical base’s expansion due to: a) the further accumulation of examples, b) the scientific adaptation of various genres’ works.
References
Bakhtin, M. (1979). The answer to the question of the editorial board of the “New World” [Otvet na vopros redakcii «Novogo mira»]. In: Ehstetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creativity]. Moscow: Art, pp. 328–335 [in Russian].
Breht, B. (1965). About the experimental theater [Ob eksperimental'nom teatre]. In: Brekht, B. Theater: Plays. Articles. Statements [Teatr: P'esy. Stat'i. Vyskazyvaniya]. In 5 volumes. Vol. 5 (2). Moscow: Iskusstvo, pp. 83–101. [in Russian].
Bucko, A. (2013). “Boris Godunov” by Bieito: Was there a boy? [«Boris Godunov» ot Biejto: A byl li mal’chik?]. Available at: http://www.dw.com/ru.a-16609922 (accessed: 20.05.2021) [in Russian].
Havrilova, L. and Psarova, L. (2016). Interpretation of a musical work: the theoretical aspects [Interpretatsiia muzychnoho tvoru: teoretychni aspekty]. In: Teacher professionalism: the theoretical and the methodological aspects [Profesionalizm pedahoha: teoretychni y metodychni aspekty]. Issue 3, рр. 97–106. [in Ukrainian].
Haiduk, M. (2016). “Babylon: The Opera Whore” [«Vavylon»: opera-bludnytsia]. In: Music [Muzyka]. Ukrainian online magazine. Available at: http://mus.art.co.ua/vavylon-operabludnytsya/ (accessed: 20.05.2021) [in Ukrainian].
Kotliarevska, O. I. (1996). Variable potential of a musical work: the culturological aspect of interpretation [Variatyvnyi potentsial muzychnoho tvoru: kulturolohichnyi aspekt interpretuvannia]. The dissertation author’s abstract for gaining the degree of the Candidate of Art Criticism by specialty 17.00.03 Music Art. Tchaikovsky National music academy of Ukraine. Kyiv, 19 p. [in Ukrainian].
Liashenko, O. (1999). Artistic and pedagogical interpretation of musical works [Khudozhno-pedahohichna interpretatsiia muzychnykh tvoriv]. In: Art and education [Mystetstvo ta osvita]. Issue 4, рр. 54–67 [in Ukrainian].
Moskalenko, V. (2013). Musical interpretation lectures [Lekcii po muzykal’noj interpretacii]. Kiev: Tipografija «Kljaksa», 271 p. [in Russian].
Musorgskij, M. P. (1932). Letter to N. A. Rimsky-Korsakov dated July 27, 1870. In: Musorgskij, M. P. Letters and documents [Pis’ma i dokumenty], comp., introd. article by A. N. Rimsky-Korsakov. Moscow; Leningrad: Muzgiz, pp. 65–67. [in Russian].
Nikolaievska, Yu. (2020) Homo interpretatus in the musical art of the 20th — early 21st century [Homo interpretatus v muzychnomu mystetstvi ХХ — pochatku ХХІ st.]: monograph. Kharkiv National Kotlyarevsky University of Arts. Kharkiv: Fakt. 576 p. [in Ukrainian].
Pospelov, P. (2020). Sergei Nevski: We got a little crazy Eastern European opera [Sergei Nevskii: U nas poluchilas' nemnogo soshedshaya s uma vostochno-evropeiskaya opera]. Interview with S. Nevsky. In: Musical life [Muzykal'naya zhizn']. February 2. Available at: hhttps://muzlifemagazine.ru/sergey-nevskiy-u-nas-poluchilas-nemno (accessed: 20.05.2021) [in Russian].
Potapova, N. (2006). “Boris Godunov” as a premonition [«Boris Godunov» kak predchuvstvie]. In: Mariinsky Theatre [Mariinskij teatr]. Issue 1–2, р. 3. [in Russian].
Solomonova, O. (2021) Interpretive content of the modern musical theater: the portrait in the style of ad libitum [Interpretatsiinyi kontent modernoho muzychnoho teatru: portret u styli ad libitum]. In: Scientific herald of Tchaikovsky National Music Academy of Ukraine [Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoi muzychnoi akademii Ukrainy imeni P. I. Chaikovskoho]. Issue 130: History of music — 2020. Anniversary and memorable dates [Istoriia muzyky — 2020. Yuvileini ta pamiatni daty]. Kyiv, pp. 143–159 [in Ukrainian].
Solomonova, O. (2011). The most Soviet “Soviet” music [Samaja sovetskaja “sovetskaja” muzyka]. In: Scientific herald of Tchaikovsky National Music Academy of Ukraine [Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoi muzychnoi akademii Ukrainy imeni P. I. Chaikovskoho]. Issue 97: Рupils — to the teacher [Uchni — vchyteliu]. Kyiv, рр. 118–130 [in Russian].
Solomonova, O. B. (2008). The laughter world of Russian classical music [Smikhovyi svit rosiiskoi muzychnoi klasyky]. Manuscript of Dissertation work for gaining the degree of the Doctor of Art Criticism by specialty 17.00.03 Music Art. Tchaikovsky National music academy of Ukraine. Kyiv, 436 p. [in Ukrainian].
Khutorska, H. (2009). Composer’s interpretation of a poetic text as an artistic translation (on the example of chamber-vocal music) [Kompozytorska interpretatsiia poetychnoho tekstu yak khudozhnii pereklad (na prykladi kamerno-vokalnoi muzyky)]. The dissertation author’s abstract for gaining the degree of the Candidate of Art Criticism by specialty 17.00.03 Music Art. Kharkiv National Kotlyarevsky University of Arts. 17 р. [in Ukrainian].
Chekan, Yu. (1992). Historical and functional study of musical works (on the example of Tchaikovsky’s Sixth Symphony) [Istoryko-funktsionalne doslidzhennia muzychnykh tvoriv (na prykladi Shostoi symfonii P. I. Chaikovskoho)]. The dissertation author’s abstract for gaining the degree of the Candidate of Art Criticism by specialty 17.00.03 Music Art. Tchaikovsky Kyiv State Conservatory. Kyiv. 19 p. [in Ukrainian].
Shadronov, V. (2918). Mussorgsky, Britten and Shostakovich in KZCh: Gaso, Conductor Vladimir Yurovsky, Solist Nikolay Didenko [Musorhskyi, Brytten y Shostakovych v KZCh: HASO, dyr. Vladymyr Yurovskyi, sol. Nykolai Dydenko]. In: Livejournal. 7 july. Available at: https://users.livejournal.com/-arlekin-/3827236.html (accessed: 13.06.2021) [in Russian].
Shapovalova, L. (2017). Interpretology as an integrative science [Interpretologija kak integrativnaja nauka]. In: Problems of interaction of art, pedagogy and theory and practice of education [Problemy vzaiemodii mystetstva, pedahohiky ta teorii i praktyky osvity]. Issue 46, рр. 289–300. [in Russian].
Shklovskij, V. (1983). About prose theory [O teorii prozy]. Moscow : Sovetskii pisatel'. 384 p. [in Russian].
Eco, U. (2003). Six walks in the literary woods [Shest’ progulok v literaturnyh leash]. Saint Petersburg: Simpozium. 285 p. [in Russian].