Interpretation Content of the Modern Musical Theater: Portrait in the Style of ad Libitum

ДО 195-РІЧЧЯ ДРАМИ «БОРИС ГОДУНОВ» ОЛЕКСАНДРА ПУШКІНА І 150-РІЧЧЯ ТРАГЕДІЇ «ЦАР БОРИС» ОЛЕКСІЯ ТОЛСТОГО

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31318/2522-4190.2021.130.231226

Keywords:

the interpretive strategy, the modern musical theater, the project “Boris” by Mussorgsky-Nevsky, the synthesis, the alternative role of the composer

Abstract

Relevance of the study. The interpretive space of modern musical theater is one of the most dynamic, multivariate and modernized world culture phenomena. In the era of culture “non-classical paradigm” the past cult operas viability is maintained through their renewed representation and “alienation”. The refusal to perceive the author’s work as complete and the only possible for realization emancipates the modern interpretive strategy and opens up endless possibilities until the emergence of the “corporate” opera text’s phenomenon. So the interpretation process extends to the work’s “inner sanctum” — to its music and thus allows the involvement of the modern artist’s personality to co-author with the composer of the past. The unique example is the opera project “Boris” by corporate authorship of Modest Mussorgsky and contemporary Russian-German composer Sergei Nevsky (2020, Staatsoper). The need for update the ideas about the modern musical theater’s interpretive strategy and the lack of this project research provides the relevance and the innovative essence of the material.
Main objective of the study is to determine the modern interpretive strategies of modern opera theater on the example of the project “Boris”.
Methodology. The material specificity led to the adaptation of the fellowing research methods: the interpretive — to identify the modern musical theater main interpretive strategies in relation to the production of “Boris Godunov” by M. Mussorgsky with an emphasis on the project “Boris”; the hermeneutic-semantic — for the purpose of reveal the intonation-image specificity of the analyzed S. Nevsky’s project; the comparative — for juxtaposition of two co-operas authored by Mussorgsky and Nevsky as components of the project “Boris”; the holistic intonation analysis — to study the intonation and drama specifics of the hybrid work.
Results and conclusions. The modernity interpretive reality initiates the emergence of radically new trends in the opera interpretation. An example of the modern musical theater innovative strategy is the hybrid project “Boris” synthesized from two stylistically contrasting operas that belong to different epochs: “Boris Godunov” by M. Mussorgsky and “Second-hand Time” by S. Nevsky. The research considered the intonation-genre specificity and its indicators from the point of view of the associative musical text theory. The associative text of “Boris” exists in two versions: as a quotation (in S. Nevsky’s opera “Second-hand Time” was adapted the material from “Boris Godunov” by M. Mussorgsky); b) in the form of a whole work presented by Mussorgsky’s opera “Boris Godunov” in the framework of the entire project “Boris” which is a unique opera phenomenon.

Author Biography

Olga Solomonova, Tchaikovsky National Music Academy of Ukraine

Doctor of Art Criticism, Professor at the Department of World Music History

References

Herasymova-Persydska, N. (2008). 21 century and musica mundana [ХХІ stolittia i musica mundana]. In: Journal of the Tchaikovsky National Music Academy of Ukraine [Chasopys Natsionalnoi muzychnoi akademii Ukrainy imeni P. I. Chaikovskoho]. Issue 1 (1), Kyiv, pp. 90–97 [in Ukrainian].

Gerasimova-Persidskaya, N. (2017). The experience of reasoning about the peculiarities of the modern music comprehending [Opyt rassuzhdeniya ob osobennostyakh postizheniya sovremennoi muzyki]. In: Scientific herald of Tchaikovsky National Music Academy of Ukraine [Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoi muzychnoi akademii Ukrainy imeni P. I. Chaikovskoho]. Issue 119: Scientific dialogues with N. A. Gerasimova-Persidskaya [Naukovi dialohy z N. O. HerasymovoiuPersydskoiu]. Kyiv, pp. 57–64 [in Russian].

Gerasimova-Persidskaya, N. (2012). Music in a new cultural paradigm [Muzyka v novoi kul’turnoi paradigm]. In: Music. Time. Space [Muzyka. Vremya. Prostranstvo]. Kiev: Dukh i litera, pp. 327–334 [in Russian].

Yefimenko, A. (2016). R. Strauss’s «Arabella» and S. Prokofiev’s «Fire Angel» (premieres of the Bavarian Staatsoper 2015) [«Arabella» R. Shtrausa i «Vohnianyi anhel» S. Prokofieva (premiery Bavarskoi Shtatsopery 2015)]. In: Journal of the Tchaikovsky National Music Academy of Ukraine [Chasopys Natsionalnoi muzychnoi akademii Ukrainy imeni P. I. Chaikovskoho]. Issue 2 (31). Kyiv, pp. 4–15 [in Ukrainian].

Kyianovska, L. (2017). What is the style outside today? [Yakyi sohodni styl nadvori?]. In: Scientific herald of Tchaikovsky National Music Academy of Ukraine [Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoi muzychnoi akademii Ukrainy imeni P. I. Chaikovskoho]. Issue 119: Scientific dialogues with N. A. Gerasimova-Persidskaya [Naukovi dialohy z N. O. Herasymovoiu-Persydskoiu]. Kyiv, pp. 65–90 [in Ukrainian].

Korchova, O. (2020). Musical modernism as terra cognita [Muzychnyi modernizm yak terra cognita]. Kyiv: Muzychna Ukraina, 490 p. [in Ukrainian].

Musorgskii, M. (1932). Letter to N. A. Rimsky-Korsakov dated July 23, 1870. In: Musorgskii M. Letters and documents [Pis’ma i dokumenty], comp., introd. article by A. N. RimskyKorsakov. Moscow; Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoe muzykal’noe izdatel’stvo, pр. 178–179 [in Russian].

Nest’eva, M. (2016) Contemporary directorial productions in opera houses [Sovremennye rezhisserskie postanovki v opernykh teatrakh]. In: Journal of the Tchaikovsky National Music Academy of Ukraine [Chasopys Natsionalnoi muzychnoi akademii Ukrainy imeni P. I. Chaikovskoho]. Issue 2 (31), pp. 16–27 [in Russian].

Oganezova-Grigorenko, O. (2019). Autopoiesis of a musical artist as a creative phenomenon and subject of musicological discourse [Avtopoezis artista myuzikla kak tvorcheskii fenomen i predmet muzykovedcheskogo diskursa]. Odessa: Astroprint, 376 p. [in Russian].

Pospelov, P. (2020). “We got a little crazy Eastern European folklore opera”: Interview with S. Nevsky [“U nas poluchilas’ nemnogo soshedshaja s uma vostochno-evropejskaja fol’klornaya opera”: Interv’ju s S. Nevskim] [online]. In: Musical life [Muzykal’naya zhizn’]. 2 February. Available at: hhttps://muzlifemagazine.ru/sergey-nevskiy-u-nas-poluchilas-nemno/(accessed: 21.02.2021) [in Russian].

Renanskii, D. (2014). Winter path into the twentieth century [Zimnii put’ v ХХ vek] Kommersant [Kommersant]. Issue 188, p. 15. Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2590108 (accessed: 21.02.2021) [in Russian].

Ruch’evskaya, E. (2005). Musorgsky’s «Khovanshchina» as an artistic phenomenon. On the problem of the genre’s poetics [«Khovanshchina» Musorgskogo kak khudozhestvennyi fenomen. K probleme poetiki zhanra]. Saint Petersburg: Kompozitor. 388 p. [in Russian].

Sadykh-Zade, G. (2006). New Moscow Documentary [Novyi moskovskii dokumentalizm]. In: Window to Europe: supplement to the newspaper «Mariinsky Theater» [Okno v Evropu: prilozhenie k gazete «Mariinskii teatr»]. Issue 1–2, p. 2 [in Russian].

Solomonova, O. (2020). Associative musical text: definition, research methodology [Asotsiatyvnyi muzychnyi tekst: definitsiia, metodolohiia doslidzhennia]. In: Methodology Problems of Contemporary Art History and Cultural Studies [Problemy metodolohii suchasnoho mystetstvoznavstva ta kulturolohii]. Abstracts of the II International Scientific Conference. Kyiv, pp. 139–142 [in Ukrainian].

Solomonova, O. (2016). «The fate has decided so»: resonances of baroque symbolism in «Boris Godunov» and «Khovanshchina» by M. Mussorgsky [«Dolia tak vyrishyla»: rezonansy barokovoi symvoliky v «Borysi Hodunovi» ta «Khovanshchyni» M. Musorhskoho]. In: Aspects of historical musicology. Issue VII: Baroque ciphers of world art [Aspekty istorychnoho muzykoznavstva. Vyp. VII: Barokovi shyfry svitovoho mystetstva]. Kharkiv National Kotlyarevsky University of Arts. Kharkiv, pp. 111–130 [in Ukrainian].

Solomonova, O. (2016). Opera for all the times: «Boris Godunov» by Modest Mussorgsky on the stage of the Munich Theater [Opera na vsi chasy: «Borys Hodunov» Modesta Musorhskoho na stseni Miunkhenskoho teatru]. In: Journal of the Tchaikovsky National Music Academy of Ukraine [Chasopys Natsionalnoi muzychnoi akademii Ukrainy imeni P. I. Chaikovskoho]. Issue 2 (31), pp. 43–53 [in Ukrainian].

Stolyarova, L. and Belousov, P. (2014). Death of Tsarevich Dimitri in Uglich on May 15, 1591: new version [Smert’ tsarevicha Dimitriya v Ugliche 15 maya 1591 goda: novaya versiya]. In: Petersburg historical journal [Peterburgskii istoricheskii zhurnal]. Saint Petersburg Institute of History of the Russian academy of Sciences. Issue 1, pp. 5–24 [in Russian].

Cherkashyna-Hubarenko, M. (2015). Opera in the changing space-time [Opernyi teatr u minlyvomu chasoprostori]. Kharkiv: Akta. 380 p. [in Ukrainian].

Eko, U. (2004). Open work [Otkrytoe proizvedenie], transl. from ital. by A. Shurbelev. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt. 384 p. [in Russian].

Yurovskii, V. (2015). Mussorgsky is the music of the 21st century [Musorgskii — eto muzyka XXI veka]. In: Kommersant [Kommersant]. January 19. Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2649399 (accessed: 21.01.2019) [in Russian].

Published

2021-03-18

How to Cite

Solomonova, O. (2021) “Interpretation Content of the Modern Musical Theater: Portrait in the Style of ad Libitum: ДО 195-РІЧЧЯ ДРАМИ «БОРИС ГОДУНОВ» ОЛЕКСАНДРА ПУШКІНА І 150-РІЧЧЯ ТРАГЕДІЇ «ЦАР БОРИС» ОЛЕКСІЯ ТОЛСТОГО”, Scientific herald of Tchaikovsky National Music Academy of Ukraine, (130), pp. 143–159. doi: 10.31318/2522-4190.2021.130.231226.

Issue

Section

ANNIVERSARY THEATER-FESTIVAL SPACE